Towards Revolution, For My Conservative Friends
Revolutions kill, maim, and disable those they claim to help. Good change is boring and available to you without a shot fired.
I wrote the first edition of Towards Revolution almost a year ago. It targets the Bernie Sanders “Our Revolution” wing of the Democratic party which I find so grotesquely worded. But today, on the eve of the election, I am rewriting the post with the hopes it hits home for our conservative readers as well.
We have added a number of readers and I hope that they and their friends take our words to heart in the coming weeks. Please share today.
The world changes without revolution. For instance, your car; you don’t have flat tires. That didn’t require a revolution. We don’t have overheating car radiators. There was no car radiator revolution.
Flat tires and blown radiators were both common occurrences not that many years ago, but something has changed. Car parts are engineered better now. No one got shot to make that true.
We are safer, more prompt, more reliable, and spend less money on vehicle repairs. We can get across town or across the country with less worry
Without any revolution, modern cars tires are so reliable that many new cars do not even have a place to store a spare. There was not a cover of USA Today headline when a tire technologist announced as a “revolution” whatever series of incremental improvements got us off the roadside, unable to use that “flat tire” excuse when we arrive late. It was too boring to make the news.
A lot of problems get solved this way. Even in government policy, wonky changes in something like funding incentives can result in lives saved, money preserved, commutes shortened, healthier babies and other improvements that happen in a way that does not make a good news clip or eighth grade history lesson. They don't surface to the minds of the people, even those whose lives are changed by it every day. The world changes course and no one notices.
I knew of a man who developed a new way to preserve topsoil that is used by most American farmers today. I can’t remember his name and you have never heard of him, but he changed American agriculture. He didn’t have to shoot a single fellow American.
There’s politics and policy. Long before revolution, we got options.
Lately, politics, the act of promoting a future (I would say that is in contrast to policy , the act of changing the future), does not thrive on the language of incremental improvement or difficult-to-explain engineering. Politics lately uses a two-stage rocket of rhetoric. First, it gets off the landing pad with intolerance of the current situation. Then, it promises dramatic, sudden change — transformation.
Revolution.
Ah, revolution. A method of change that really sticks in the brain. Revolutions get chapter headings in history class. A blood-drenched block of time chopped out of the flow of human lives. Revolutions bronze people into characters. They become heroes and villains bonded to their time, their chapter, their revolution.
Revolution works well in focus groups of people like you
Political rhetoric turns to the word “revolution” to stir action. It works! Even middle class people with personal security unparalleled in the history of all civilization are excited enough by the idea of joining a revolution that they will contribute money and perhaps even time to a cause. They are buying bullets today so they can be a part of tomorrow’s revolution.
The excitement, urgency, and immediacy keeps them from reason. They become convinced they are at a breaking point and must break something else to preserve their lifestyle, to repair what is broken. If you keep listening, you are ready to be a revolutionary.
Then you can, in the name of revolution, transgress customs, break laws, risk yourself and your loved ones. You would not be the first stirred to murder by a worthy revolution.
A popular American politician named his organization "Our Revolution." Then folks who went to The Capitol on January 6, 2020 used the word. They were both fed the marketing power of revolution. I don’t think either realized how much suffering revolution unleashes on those they love.
I am repulsed by a call to revolution. The idea churns my guts. I am lucky enough to have lived in the stable world that both the Bernie Bros and the January 6 insurrectionists did, so I have not lived through a revolution. Those who have tell sad stories. It ain’t glory in revolution.
It is blood pouring from victims (people you knew yesterday, dying now in front of you) as violence hacks at the helpless. Survivors remember deprivation, starvation. Kkilling cold and killing heat, seeking shelter more important than\ justice.
I have never experienced any of this and do not want to.
Whether they picked a side or not, witnesses to revolution store the memory wrapped in trauma. They talk of it only when it is important enough for someone to hear what revolution feels like. They are shaken by the memory and do not want to return to revolution.
You know what I don't like about revolution, other than the false conclusion that it is how we transform our lives, our communities, our country? This is it; I don't like that no matter who initiates the revolution, the poor and powerless will suffer and die.
They will walk immense distances to be homeless refugees in a place that does not want them. I hate that the wealthy (most of you who are reading this, the vast majority, those with a house with an internet connection and a computer and a nice warm drink of choice, when I say wealthy I am talking about you even though I acknowledge you are also scared and vulnerable and angry that the world is unjust, you have wealth and stability that is the envy of the world.) fly away, perhaps temporarily slightly less wealthy. Revolution brings suffering upon the people already suffering the most.
Revolution brings suffering to people in the name of saving them.
There will be a dramatic photo, a tattered flag raised. A good speech. Moments for the history class to discover later. Those who survive will carry shell shock forward, then have to re-enter the hard, undramatic work of politics and policy anyway before the relief they marched and killed for becomes real. Revolution does not even save you from the drudgery of bureaucratic process.
When some ignormaus says that this calls for revolution, I picture dead bodies on the streets in front of my house, not knowing if they are the families of those who agreed with me or those who disagreed.
And it does not have to be. We made a nation that can change if you participate. If you engage with those who disagree with you. We have done it many times and can continue. Politics and policy are where we meet and do unglamorous work of realizing a new country without killing and starving our families.
So, when I can't sort out how to solve a problem, I don't call for revolution. I wonder how we quietly managed to make a better car tire. The body count is lower.
See:
- Mark Twain "The War Prayer"
- John Lennon "Revolution"
Think of revolution as a true revolution, a movement or a battle that simply ends where it begins with a change of figureheads; those who seek to gain the power from those who lost. Also know that the extreme violence of a Revolution made a sacrosanct document which guides us to this day (US Constitution). Rebellion and resistance to power have historically been more productive at real change in the mentality of a culture. We can rebel and resist in our every day lives, and the only thing hurt is other people’s feelings. Shit…I have a life long poem “from Revolution” and it isn’t titled “Toward Revolution” for a reason. Read Albert Camus’ “The Rebel” as that’s where it began for me in small town rural Amerikkka in the early 80s when the first “Make America Great Again” campaign happened with Ronnie Ray-gun. Also to note “America First” was a KKK slogan in the 1920s and 1930s. Talk about a revolution of rhetoric! Samo samo.